Monday, January 16, 2006

世貿會議帶來的道德思考

由漠不關心到初步認識,由視示威者為暴民到同情韓國農民的慘況,由只報導防避世貿的激烈示威到探討世貿為人民造成的壓迫,這些都是世貿會議為部份香港人和傳媒所帶來的一些轉變。

雖然世貿部長級會議已曲終人散,大部份海外抗議世貿人士亦已離港返回老家,但整個過程卻留下甚多值得思考的道德問題,包括世貿大力推動的新自由主義和企業領導的經濟全球化對平民百姓所帶來的後果、會議期間所發生的拘捕事件的合理性和接著的各方反應回響,以及個人消費行為的自主性等。

當中,筆者留意到有關韓農與警方發生衝突後誰對誰錯的討論。有論者謂韓農「衝擊警方」後,市民及民間組織仍偏幫農民,是採取黑白分明的思考角度,打造敵我分明的世界,他們既已站在同情農民的一方,便漠視韓農採取暴力的事實,這是對道德的嚴重扭曲云云。 

世上很多事情的確不是非黑即白,而將意見不同的人一律視為敵人更是不可取。這種思考方法缺乏理性和細緻的分析,會自以為掌握一切真理而不容異己,故不應是爭取公義的民間組織或個人所持有的處事態度。

然而,當仔細分析上述論者的論調,其理據亦不見得站得住腳,而且亦墜入片面和二元分析之嫌。

單憑傳媒幾個剪接畫面的報導,既沒有親歷其境,亦沒有進一步求證,這些論者就否定包括韓農在內的大部份示威人士是以和平方式進行示威,更接受警方的單方面解釋,把衝突定性為暴力騷亂,無視在場人士的親身經驗;以片蓋全地泛指韓農攻擊警方,因而把警方向一眾海外及本地示威者(以至禍及在場的記者途人)施以胡椒嘖霧、水炮和催淚彈的行為合理化,以及長時間拘留示威者的適當性。這判斷明顯有偏差。
當事後警方的手法受到民間組織和評論員批評時(當中包括陳日君主教指警方高層決策錯誤是香港之恥),竟有通識教育講師在未瞭解批評者的詳細內容,而指他們把警方視為敵人,無視一些前線警員所受到的傷害,並指他們的道德感已嚴重受扭曲。

當然,前線警員有其難處,其職務使之與示威者處於對立面,他們的處境的確值得同情。然而,相信示威人士和民間組織無意將警方非人化,亦不是持敵我分明的思維模式。陳主教及批評者除了憐憫韓農外,亦有查訪當日在場人士,不是隨便作判斷。或許該講師及其他論者與一般市民一樣,在缺乏求證和批判態度下便單憑傳媒的選擇性報導而被誤導,看不到電視畫面以外示威者所受到的更多不人道和暴力對待;又或甘願選擇性地相信和放大某些現實情境,不願聽取個別在場人士的切身經驗,硬把自己的一套表面上中肯的道德理論加諸在民間組織和批評者身上,並借復和為名掩飾當權者的暴力。

其實,更重要的是查問衝突的根源,若非世貿被強國所控制,而有權力者又漠視人民現實的慘況,韓農和眾多受影響的民眾何苦遠渡重洋來港向世貿決策者表達心聲,現在仍有十多人被迫與家人分離滯港等候應訊。不論世貿或港府的強權無形暴力,都比示威衝突來得更嚴重。面對這情況,我們又會作什麼道德判斷和行動呢? 
  
公教報 15.1.2006

Thursday, January 5, 2006

Role of the Church in the midst of Globalization

On Dec. 13, the sixth ministerial conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) will formally begin in Hong Kong. To most of Hong Kong's people, influenced by the mass media, the six-day meeting only means that many activists will come to Hong Kong to join demonstrations and that riots may occur. Moreover, based on the propaganda of the Hong Kong government, they also think that the WTO can bring more business opportunities, more choices to consumers and may even improve the livelihood of the poor. They do not really know what the meeting is going to discuss nor the impact of the WTO on the lives of people in developing countries.

Although many analyses and experiences have been written about the oversimplified neoliberal market ideology, the cost of so-called free trade as promoted by the WTO and the harmful effects suffered by small farmers and workers, these facts are not widely known by Hong Kong's people in general and specifically Hong Kong's Christians. This phenomenon is most likely true in many other communities and countries as well. Just like many other people, Hong Kong's Christians do not fully understand why so many non-governmental organisations (NGOs), activists and farmers from different countries are coming to Hong Kong to protest against the WTO, an important actor of globalisation.

In the face of this lack of understanding, the Church shoulders an even greater responsibility to inform the Christian community about the reality of free trade and WTO policies and must give them guidance. In reading the signs of the times, the Christian community cannot ignore the phenomenon of globalisation. The Church's social mission must address this reality. It is true that economic globalisation and free trade can have some positive effects. However, if it is ruled merely by the laws of the market that suit the powerful, the results cannot but be negative. Whatever aspect of globalisation—liberalisation or privatisation, free trade or tariff agreements, opening markets or capital mobilisation, flexibility of work or deregulation of work—if the results cannot lead to greater unity and closer relationships but rather create greater alienation and fragmentation, the direction of globalisation must be reevaluated and changed. Thus, the Church must reflect on and carry out its social mission in light of the ethical implications of globalisation and its main promoters, like the WTO.

American Catholic theologian Howland Sanks, in appropriating the analysis of Anthony Giddens and Roland Robertson on globalisation, suggests some issues that the Church should address in this context and how this can be done. These thoughts can inspire us when reflecting on the pastoral challenges of the Church. Several of their points are worth consideration for further reflection.

Following the analysis of the four dimensions of globalisation by Giddens, the Church can take steps to strengthen the positive effects and counteract the harmful impact of each aspect of globalisation. At the level of nation states, the Church can foster intermediary civil societies that monitor and promote human rights and democratic forms of government. A society of sustainability and equality for all should be promoted with a just and ethical economic system and accountable and responsible public and private institutions so that more people can participate in deciding the policies that affect their lives. At the international system of societies, the Church can support and collaborate with international organisations on specific problems, such as the rules and policies of international financial and trade institutions, and can be an advocate for fair trade, the just treatment and protection of workers and farmers, the defence of human rights and labour rights and environmental protection. The Church can also foster cooperation between churches at regional levels.

Moreover, with the stronger and stronger influence of the global capitalist economy, which leads to greater inequality in the distribution of wealth, more unemployment and underemployment and the "causalisation" of labour, the Church can criticise the ideology of neoliberal capitalism and put pressure on affluent countries to eliminate poverty in concrete ways.

Sanks points out that globalisation does not simply refer to increasing interconnectedness. It also refers to subjective matters, such as how we think about the world, ourselves, our countries and the relationships between them. Living in a globalised world, we should be conscious of other societies beyond our national territorial boundaries and may identify with and have allegiance to groups around the globe. We are more and more aware of ourselves as part of humanity as a whole whose very existence is affected by events that occur in distant lands. This viewpoint is similar to the principle of the common good and solidarity in Christian ethics. The Church must make a greater effort to raise the consciousness of the whole Christian community and must also take concrete actions to show solidarity with the poor and promote their empowerment. To nurture a sense of co-responsibility, the Church can encourage Christians to put these aims into practice in their daily lives through their consumption habits, working relationships with employers and employees and by monitoring the treatment of workers by corporations and so on.

Moreover, the Christian Church can try to build a global culture, not a Western culture, with other faith traditions for the collective living of humankind in promoting a culture of love, peace and justice. The Church can affirm the universal principles of human solidarity and subsidiarity while adapting them to particular cultural contexts as an example of using cultural diversity against homogeneity.

On the individual level, in the face of the harmful effects being brought about by globalisation, the Church can break through the sense of hopelessness and helplessness, emphasising the place of agency in social change. Despite the obstacles, the message that individuals can, and do, make a difference, even in today's terribly complex global context, should be emphasised.
The issues to be discussed at the upcoming WTO conference, such as those relating to agricultural and non-agricultural products, services and trade related to intellectual property, look complicated. The difference in power between the wealthy countries and developing countries is enormous. However, as a community of faith, hope and love, we believe that each of us can act to transform the present imbalances and injustices in the world and that the Church as a whole can work together to bring about change on behalf of the world's impoverished people.

(HK Christian Institute newsletter 30 Dec 2005)